01 / 03
Statements and the application, read the same way every time
It runs on the documents already sitting in your submissions mailbox. What comes back is a written summary, set out in the order an underwriter works through one, so a file reaches your credit call assembled rather than being assembled during it.
What comes back
- Monthly revenue taken from the deposits themselves, set beside the revenue the application states.
- NSF count and negative days, reported per statement month rather than averaged into one figure.
- Which month the newest statement covers, stated plainly, so nobody learns the packet is stale from a funder.
- Duplicate months, missing months, and pages that did not survive the scan.
- The red flags that get a file declined, named, with the statement page each one came off.
What it does not do
- It does not approve, decline, price or score anything. It reads documents and writes down what is in them.
- Nothing is pulled from a bureau, and the summary is not a credit report. Every figure in it comes out of the packet you sent.
- It does not replace your underwriter. The summary is written to be checked by one, and it cites pages so that it can be.
- It cannot see what is not there. A missing month is reported as missing, never estimated into place.